• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (1)
  •  

NB: Fishery groups, academics warn cuts will jeopardize fishery

Published on May 29, 2012
Published on May 29, 2012
Kevin Bissett  RSS Feed

Latest News

See All Articles

Regional News

See All Articles

The Canadian Press

Maria Recchia of the Fundy North Fishermen's Association says every government scientist who has worked on the impact of aquaculture pesticides is slated to be laid off or transferred.

Topics :
Department of Fisheries and Oceans , Association in New Brunswick , Fisheries and Oceans Canada , Fundy North Fishermen , P.E.I. , East Coast

[FREDERICTON, NB] — Fisheries groups and academics say federal government cuts to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans will put the fishery at risk.

Maria Recchia, executive director of the Fundy North Fishermen's Association in New Brunswick, said every government scientist who has worked on the impact of aquaculture pesticides on the marine ecosystem and the fishery are slated to be laid off or transferred.

"It's very frightening to even have pesticides in the marine environment, but then to not have any scientists around to be studying it — that's a whole lot more scary," she said Monday. "If our fishermen discover a lobster kill tomorrow, who will study how they died? Will fishermen have to pay private scientists to do this work?"

The federal government announced last week it would cut the department's operational budget by $79.3 million over three years. It will mean a cut of about 400 people from its workforce.

Fisheries and Oceans Minister Keith Ashfield was unavailable for interview Monday, but his spokeswoman, Erin Filliter, defended the cuts and said research will still be done.

"Fisheries and Oceans Canada is refocusing its research on priority areas that directly support conservation and fisheries management," Filliter said in an email. "In lieu of in-house research on the biological effects of contaminants and pesticides, the department will establish an advisory group and research fund of $1.4 million a year to work with academia and other independent facilities to get advice on priority issues and ensure departmental priorities are met."

Recchia panned that idea.

"I think it would be challenging to get unbiased research when it's very likely that the research is going to be funded by the industries that are being examined," she said.

It was also rejected by Peter Hodson, a biology professor at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont.

"Effectively there will be absolutely no capacity within Fisheries and Oceans to measure chemicals, let alone comment on them. That's pretty disturbing. That's throwing away a long history of research," he said.

Hodson and about 100 other academics, business leaders and government employees signed a letter that was sent to Prime Minister Stephen Harper on Monday asking him to reverse the cuts.

In the letter, they say that without first-class scientists, the federal government would be unable to respond to crises that could cripple vital fisheries.

"For example, the rapid and very effective response by scientists from DFO and the National Research Council to the shellfish crisis in P.E.I. in the late 1980s literally saved the lives of many Canadians, the viability of the East Coast shellfish industry, and Canada's international reputation as a source of high quality seafood," the letter reads.

Pam Parker of the Atlantic Fish Farmers Association said Fisheries Department scientists have done a lot to help her industry grow.

"Certainly our salmon enhancement program and hatchery program wouldn't be where they are, for the conservation side, without the work that DFO scientists have done," Parker said.

She said the aquaculture industry in the Bay of Fundy works within very strict boundaries developed by department scientists that take into account tidal action and underwater currents.

"These boundaries are not just arbitrary lines on a map, but they actually mean something."

Hodson said increased oil exploration in the Arctic and the possible export of oil sands through the West Coast makes the need for in-house scientific expertise more important than ever.

"It's not to say that we're going to lose the fish, but if we don't protect them, we could certainly do a hell of a lot of damage."

Comments

  • Username
    sick of conservatives
    - June 18, 2012 at 20:17:42

    Keith Ashfield never comments on anything of concern, because he has nothing constructive to say. What a puppet of Herr Harper. This government is making Canada a laughingstock of the world. Scientists in the federal civil service say they refuse to go to international conferences because they are shunned for their backwards views that are forced on them by this government. I cannot wait for the day they are sent packing--it should have happened long ago due to their dishonest election-rigging.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Advertising